H
Harvest
AI Summarized Content

I tested 7 AI Design tools, here are the results. (Lovable, Replit, V0)


Introduction: The AI Tool Overload πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

The video kicks off with a relatable problem:

"Guys, we have a problem. There are too many AI tools out there and it is overwhelming."

The creator, Sam Fabio, shares his frustration:

"Tired of writing prompt after prompt after prompt on different tools and getting horrible results."

He admits:

"Personally, I've stopped jumping on every new tool. And what I'm doing instead is I try to identify the really good ones and stick to them."

Goal of the video:
Test seven AI design tools for UI design and prototyping, using one prompt for all, with no prompt editing or refinement.
He promises:

"By the end of this video, you will have a good idea of what the quality of the output for each tool looks like and that should help you make a decision on which ones to stick to so you don't get overwhelmed like me."

He introduces himself:

"If you're new here, my name is Sam Fabio. I've been a product designer for 9 years and in that time I work with startups in Lagos, Nigeria, and a few ho companies in the UK including Deliveroo and Monto Bank."


The 7 AI Design Tools to Be Tested πŸ› οΈ

The tools are:

  • Replit
  • Lovable
  • Magic Patterns
  • Bold New
  • Polyt
  • Firebase
  • V0

Design Task:

"The goal is to design a simple back office tool for gym owners. The gym owners will be able to use this tool to store their profiles of their members, create new classes, and manage appointments and bookings."


Scoring Criteria πŸ†

Each tool will be scored on three criteria (5 points each, total 15):

  1. Interactivity

    "How well the tool can introduce interactive elements like forms, over states, and actions just from one prompt. This basically shows how much initiative the tool can take from one prompt."

  2. Control

    "How easy it is for users to make changes to the design so that it can suit their preferences."

  3. Visual Design

    "How clean and modern the design generated is."


Getting Started: Prompt & Inspiration ✍️🎨

To begin, Sam needs:

  • A prompt to instruct the tool
  • UI design inspiration to guide the tools

He uses mobin.com for inspiration:

"Mobin literally has any kind of real world design patterns you're looking for."

He searches for dashboards and downloads a screen to use as a reference.

He also shares a promo code for Mobin:

"Mobin told me to tell you that if you use my promo code.com/samour, you'd get 20% off on their paid plan. I think that's a good deal."


Crafting the Prompt: Meta Prompting πŸ€–

Sam introduces meta prompting:

"Meta prompting is when you describe a goal you want to achieve to a foundational AI model like Chachipity or CRUD. Then you ask it to generate the prompt that you can use on another AI tool."

He explains:

"It's like asking your friend who already understands you to help you get your thoughts across to their friend because you haven't really met them and don't understand them yet."

He warns:

"Please, please, please and please don't just copy and paste the prompt generated by Chachup into another tool. Read the prompt and refine it."

He adds the Mobin UI inspiration to the prompt and sends it to all seven tools.


Quick Interlude: Subscribe! πŸ“’

Sam shares a surprising stat:

"82% of the people that watch this channel regularly haven't subscribed. That's a poor stat. So, if you're one of those 82%, what are you waiting for? Hit that subscribe button and my promise to you is to make sure you never stop learning on this channel. Do we have a deal?"


The Results: Tool-by-Tool Review & Scoring

1. Replit

  • Pages generated: Dashboard, Members, Classes, Schedule, Billing, Reports, Settings
  • Issues:
    • Navigation icons stacked oddly
    • Page content hidden behind navigation
    • Weird spacing between cards
    • Line graph not interactive
    • Some interactivity (add member, add class)
    • Feedback on actions (even if error state)
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 2.5
    • Control: 2.5
    • Visual Design: 2
    • Total: 7/15
  • Quote:

    "The fact that this thing is stuck behind the navbar is really going to make it lose some points."


2. V0

  • Pages generated: All required pages
  • Positives:
    • Well-designed cards
    • Some interactivity (add member, add class)
    • Can switch between list and calendar view
  • Negatives:
    • No feedback after adding member
    • No avatars/initials in profiles
    • Over states not accessible
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 3.5
    • Control: 2.5
    • Visual Design: 3.5
    • Total: 10/15
  • Quote:

    "I would have loved if it pulled in some avatars or even initials into this profile."


3. Lovable

  • Similar to V0:
    • Cards, line graph (not interactive), add member/class
  • Positives:
    • Side drawer for extra actions
    • Waitlist shown for classes
    • Calendar view is clear and visually appealing
    • Edit with Lovable feature for direct editing
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 3.5
    • Control: 4
    • Visual Design: 3.5
    • Total: 11/15
  • Quote:

    "One thing I like is like this edit with Lovable feature that allows me to be able to make changes and make edits. I think that's the kind of control that I'm talking about."


4. Polyt

  • Unique Features:
    • Focus state and canvas state (breaks down pages into components)
    • Interactive line graph with value control
    • Pulled in profile pictures and initials for members
    • Added images to classes
    • High level of control (edit individual components)
  • Negatives:
    • Billing and reports pages not built (no empty state)
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 3.5
    • Control: 4.5
    • Visual Design: 4
    • Total: 12/15
  • Quote:

    "This is so cool. It's actually done so much from just one prompt, you know."
    "I think this is a really cool tool that is already standing out."


5. Magic Patterns

  • Similar to Lovable/V0:
    • No chart visualization
    • Pulled in colors for icons
    • Avatars for members
  • Negatives:
    • Add member/class not interactive
    • Feedback present but no form filling
    • Schedule view not scalable
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 2.5
    • Control: 2.5
    • Visual Design: 2.5
    • Total: 7/15
  • Quote:

    "I would love to be able to fill a form. So 2.5 for interactivity."


6. Bold New

  • Similar to Lovable/V0:
    • Chart wrongly placed, no y-axis
    • Not interactive
    • Avatars for members
    • List and calendar view for schedule
  • Negatives:
    • Visual design feels basic
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 3
    • Control: 2
    • Visual Design: 2.5
    • Total: 7.5/15
  • Quote:

    "Honestly feels like a not so finer version of lovable and v 0ero."


7. Firebase Studio (by Google)

  • Issues:
    • Navigation icons squashed
    • Weird spacing
    • Bland design
    • Took long to generate, many errors
    • Accessibility issues on schedule page
    • Empty states for billing/reports
  • Scores:
    • Interactivity: 2.5
    • Control: 2
    • Visual Design: 1.5
    • Total: 6/15
  • Quote:

    "The schedule page here is just an accessibility mess. Like I can't see anything on this schedule page."
    "Overall, I'm quite unimpressed by Firebase Studio."


Final Rankings πŸ…

  • S Tier (12+ points):

    • Polyt (12)

      "Polyt, which I literally just knew about at the time of making this video, takes the crown for the only S tier UI and code generation AI tool. Poly actually surprised me and I think more designers should try it out."

  • A Tier (10+ points):

    • Lovable (11)
    • V0 (10)
  • B Tier (7.5+ points):

    • Bold New (7.5)
  • C Tier (Below 7.5):

    • Replit (7)
    • Magic Patterns (7)
    • Firebase Studio (6)

Key Takeaways & Closing Thoughts πŸ’‘

  • Web app prototyping:

    "Something I've noticed with these tools we've explored are that they're not really great with iOS or Android app designs. They are really good at prototyping and they're better suited to web apps."

  • Invitation to discuss:

    "You can also be the judge. You saw the output from each tool. So, let me know in the comment section if you have a different opinion about the ranking. Let's discuss."

  • Teaser for next video:

    "Right here is a video that will be coming up soon on how you can use more powerful AI tools like Cors to design native iOS apps without writing a single line of code."


Summary Table

ToolInteractivityControlVisual DesignTotalTier
Polyt3.54.5412S
Lovable3.543.511A
V03.52.53.510A
Bold New322.57.5B
Replit2.52.527C
Magic Patterns2.52.52.57C
Firebase Studio2.521.56C

Final Words

If you want to avoid being overwhelmed by the flood of AI design tools, focus on the ones that deliver quality, control, and good design.
Polyt is the surprise winner, but Lovable and V0 are also strong choices.
Remember:

"Don't just copy and paste promptsβ€”refine them to get the best results!"

And most importantly:

"Hit that subscribe button and my promise to you is to make sure you never stop learning on this channel."


Which tool impressed you the most? Let Sam know in the comments! πŸ’¬

Summary completed: 7/9/2025, 6:00:53 AM

Need a summary like this?

Get instant summaries with Harvest

⚑
5-second summaries
AI-powered analysis
πŸ“±
All devices
Web, iOS, Chrome
πŸ”
Smart search
Rediscover anytime
Start Summarizing
Try Harvest